New Developments in Scientific Collaboration Tech: The future of publishing is video - presented by Dr. Andrew Preston | TooWrite; the scientific method for scientific writing - presented by Ivy Cavendish | PeerRef — Journal-independent peer review - presented by Dr Elliott Lumb | How do we measure success for Open Science? - presented by Mr Iain Hrynaszkiewicz | What does the metaverse have to do with science? - presented by Dr Chris Arthurs MMath DPhil and Mimi Keshani

New Developments in Scientific Collaboration Tech

Dr. Andrew PrestonDr Chris Arthurs MMath DPhilDr Elliott LumbMr Iain HrynaszkiewiczIvy CavendishMimi Keshani
1. The future of publishing is video
Dr. Andrew Preston
Andrew Preston
Cassyni

Every year, millions of academic seminars and thousands of research conferences take place. This large scale dissemination of knowledge has been happening for centuries, is complementary to the published literature, and much of it is now recorded.

However, sifting through millions of hours of recorded research isn't very practical. How can we make these videos searchable, citable, and a core part of the future of academic publishing? In this talk I explore cutting-edge ideas and concepts.

2. TooWrite; the scientific method for scientific writing
Ivy Cavendish
Ivy Cavendish
Springer Nature (United Kingdom)

TooWrite is a digital platform that seeks to transform the process of scientific writing into an experience that is faster, healthier, and more accessible to researchers at all career stages. This lightning talk begins by following our founder journey and the creation of TooWrite - starting with two academics with a problem to solve, all the way to being acquired and hired by world-leading publisher, Springer Nature - and ends with a look at what’s coming next for TooWrite!

3. PeerRef — Journal-independent peer review
Dr Elliott Lumb
Elliott Lumb
PeerRef

PeerRef is a journal-independent open peer review platform. Its goals are to make peer review open, make peer review more researcher-centric, and eliminate the need for repeated peer review in successive journals. In this talk, I discuss how technology and new processes can improve peer review.

4. How do we measure success for Open Science?
Mr Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
Iain Hrynaszkiewicz
Public Library of Science

There is a growing need for reliable data on Open Science practices to better understand researcher behaviour, and to understand the effectiveness of policies – of institutions, funders and publishers – at increasing adoption of Open Science [1]. In 2022 PLOS launched ‘Open Science Indicators’, (OSI) an initiative that tracks adoption of Open Science practices – such as sharing data, code, protocols and preprints – over time in the scholarly literature [2]. PLOS developed requirements for an OSI measurement framework underpinned by six guiding principles [3] and then selected DataSeer as a partner to deliver OSI using an artificial intelligence supported method.

The initial results [4] analyse adoption levels across approximately 60,000 articles published in PLOS journals and approximately 7,000 comparator articles in PubMed Central. Articles were published between the start of 2019 and the end of June 2022. New results are being released in March 2023, and then each quarter. The results show that rates of data sharing, code sharing and preprint posting are increasing between 2019 and 2022. The results also reveal differences in adoption – and potential for adoption – between research fields and geographies as well as infrastructure (data, code and preprint repositories/ servers) used, enabling analysis of trends in different communities of researchers.

The data and methods are being shared openly [5] to engage stakeholders in a conversation about how we can use quantitative, longitudinal evidence on Open Science practices to support increased adoption of Open Science globally.

References
  • 1.
    I. Hrynaszkiewicz and L. Cadwallader (2021) A survey of funders’ and institutions’ needs for understanding researchers’ open research practices.
  • 2.
    https://theplosblog.plos.org/2022/09/plos-partners-with-dataseer-to-develop-open-science-indicators/
  • 3.
    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21640889.v1
  • 4.
    https://theplosblog.plos.org/2022/12/open-science-indicators-first-dataset/
  • 5.
    https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.21687686.v1
5. What does the metaverse have to do with science?
Dr Chris Arthurs MMath DPhil
Chris Arthurs
Hadean
Mimi Keshani
Mimi Keshani
University of Cambridge

The word "metaverse" means different things to different people - including those who are working to create it. A mistake is to think of it as a single type of product or a single grouping of functionality; In reality, it will be something that arrives gradually and evolutionarily as the Internet continues to develop, rather than with the bang of a product launch.

At its heart, the metaverse is about services on the Internet becoming more spatial and more interoperable. Spatial considerations and connecting mathematical models to one another have been at the heart of computational scientific disciplines for decades. So in many respects, computational scientists are already creating what could be thought of as pieces of a metaverse.

In this talk, I shall discuss some of these scientific pieces of the metaverse, the value of communicating ideas spatially, some of the capabilities Hadean is working on, and where the future might take us.

 logo
Cite as
A. Preston et al. (2023, May 4), New Developments in Scientific Collaboration Tech
Share
Details
Listed seminar This seminar is open to all
Recorded Available to all
Video length 1:12:28
Q&A Now closed