Schrödinger’s mammoth – ecological assembly in the age of humans - presented by Dr. Kate Lyons

Schrödinger’s mammoth – ecological assembly in the age of humans

Dr. Kate Lyons

Dr. Kate Lyons
Schrödinger’s mammoth – ecological assembly in the age of humans
Dr. Kate Lyons
Kate Lyons
University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Ecologists have long been interested in how species assemble into communities. In particular, they are interested in how species traits, environmental factors, and biotic interactions affect species distributions, and membership and persistence in ecological communities. Determining whether assembly rules exist and what they are is particularly important in the face of ongoing climate change. However, despite decades of study, no clear consensus has emerged. In part because modern studies are limited by the short time scales over which they are able to collect data and by the fact that humans are incredibly successful ecosystem engineers who have affected almost every part of the planet. In contrast, paleontologists have been interested in the interplay between species traits and the environment, and how these relationships change over time in response to global forcing factors such as climate change. Increased knowledge of taphonomic processes has led to an understanding that fossil assemblages preserve reliable information about ecological communities and species interactions. By comparing the structure of these fossil assemblages with modern assemblages, we can begin to identify aspects of community structure that are similar across many taxonomic groups and across long time scales. We can also determine whether and how these patterns have changed with the increasing dominance of humans on the globe. Using a macroecological lens, I examine mammalian community structure over long and short time scales including metrics such as co-occurrence structure, body size distributions, and functional traits. I evaluate how these patterns change over time and with changes in global climate. Finally, I examine how some traits associated with extinction risk have changed over time and the consequences for ecological communities. I find that in paleoecological communities, there are consistent patterns over time in terms of co-occurrence structure, body size distributions, and extinction risk, but that many of these patterns change as human impacts increase including the role that functional traits play in mediating co-occurrence structure. These changes suggest that humans are fundamentally altering ecological communities and resetting ecological assembly rules. Paleontology has a key role to play in identifying the disruptions to assembly rules by humans and what that means for predicting how species are likely to respond to future climate change, habitat fragmentation and the loss of biotic interactions because of extinctions.

References
  • 1.
    S. K. Lyons et al. (2015) Holocene shifts in the assembly of plant and animal communities implicate human impacts. Nature
  • 2.
    S. K. Lyons et al. (2016) The changing role of mammal life histories in Late Quaternary extinction vulnerability on continents and islands. Biology Letters
  • 3.
    F. A. Smith et al. (2018) Body size downgrading of mammals over the late Quaternary. Science
  • 4.
    F. A. Smith et al. (2019) The accelerating influence of humans on mammalian macroecological patterns over the late Quaternary. Quaternary Science Reviews
  • 5.
    A. B. Tóth et al. (2019) Reorganization of surviving mammal communities after the end-Pleistocene megafaunal extinction. Science
  • 6.
    D. Fraser and S. K. Lyons (2020) Mammal Community Structure through the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum. The American Naturalist
  • 7.
    S. Pineda‐Munoz et al. (2020) Body mass‐related changes in mammal community assembly patterns during the late Quaternary of North America. Ecography
  • 8.
    S. Pineda-Munoz et al. (2021) Mammal species occupy different climates following the expansion of human impacts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 9.
    C. P. Hedberg et al. (2021) The hidden legacy of megafaunal extinction: Loss of functional diversity and resilience over the Late Quaternary at Hall’s Cave. Global Ecology and Biogeography
  • 10.
    R. Cooke et al. (2022) Anthropogenic disruptions to longstanding patterns of trophic-size structure in vertebrates. Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • 11.
    D. Fraser et al. (2022) Late quaternary biotic homogenization of North American mammalian faunas. Nature Communications
  • 12.
    F. A. Smith et al. (2023) After the mammoths: The ecological legacy of late Pleistocene megafauna extinctions. Cambridge Prisms: Extinction
  • 13.
    R. Rozzi et al. (2023) Dwarfism and gigantism drive human-mediated extinctions on islands. Science
  • 14.
    A. B. Tóth et al. (2014) A Century of Change in Kenya's Mammal Communities: Increased Richness and Decreased Uniqueness in Six Protected Areas. PLoS ONE
  • 15.
    S. K. Lyons et al. (2019) Macroecological patterns of mammals across taxonomic, spatial, and temporal scales. Journal of Mammalogy
Grants
    National Science Foundation1744223National Science Foundation1555535National Science Foundation2051255National Science Foundation2134834Australian Research CouncilDP210201324
Cambridge Prisms logo
Cite as
K. Lyons (2024, April 18), Schrödinger’s mammoth – ecological assembly in the age of humans
Share
Details
Listed seminar This seminar is open to all
Recorded Available to all
Video length 36:49
Q&A Now closed
Disclaimer The views expressed in this seminar are those of the speaker and not necessarily those of the journal