Community-Centered Strategies to Reduce Gun Violence: Developing Evidence for Policy and Practice
Community violence interventions (CVI) typically rely on individual-level behavioral change mechanisms, including law enforcement, social services, and therapeutic treatments. A few CVI models, however, include strategies derived from a public health framework to intervene at the level of neighborhoods and communities (e.g., Cure Violence). Community-centered and community-resourced approaches are important and potentially cost-effective, but they confront numerous challenges. Measuring community-level effects can be statistically complex, and advocates who support CVI as a social reform movement sometimes disparage the search for rigorous evidence. Funding agencies may support community action regardless of the evidence. These factors, and others, have resulted in a smaller-than-expected base of research evidence about community-centered and community-resourced violence prevention approaches. This Special Collection addresses challenges involved in developing evidence-backed, community-centered CVI models. What are the conceptual origins and theoretical foundations of community-centered violence prevention strategies? What CVI strategies should or should not be considered community-centered? What evaluation evidence exists for such models? What can researchers do to strengthen the evidentiary nexus of research, policy, and practice to support the political viability and growth of community-centered and community-resourced CVI approaches?
Community-Centered Strategies to Reduce Gun Violence: Developing Evidence for Policy and Practice
The outcome of the recent national election in the United States only adds urgency to the need for a more theoretically sound and methodologically diverse evidence base for public safety strategies that operate at the neighborhood and community level. Without reliable evidence, political leaders will continue to ignore socio-structural forces and view crime and violence as problems caused entirely by individual pathology, a class-based and racially divisive mode of privilege maintenance that will not be overcome with simple political rhetoric and emotional appeals.
Umair Shafique, Executive Editor of INQUIRY, provided the introduction to the Special Collection discussion.