Predictors of labor pain management among pregnant women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis - presented by Mr Teketel Ermias MSc

Predictors of labor pain management among pregnant women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Mr Teketel Ermias MSc

TE
Women's Health Seminars
Host
Women's Health
SeminarIn preparation. Please check back later.
Women's Health

Associated Women's Health article

T. E. Geltore et al. (2024) Predictors of labor pain management among pregnant women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Women's Health
Article of record
Predictors of labor pain management among pregnant women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
TE
Teketel Ermias
Wachemo University

Abstract Background: Labor pain is the nastiest conceivable pain women are involved in during labor and delivery. In this way, the end of labor pain is frequently outlined by myths and equivocalness. Hence, giving a compelling absence of pain in labor remained a challenge specifically in developing countries including Ethiopia. Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the pooled prevalence of labor analgesia and associated factors to pregnant women in Ethiopia. Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis were utilized in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews. Data Sources: PubMed/Medline, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, Google Scholars, and the Cochrane Library and supplemented it with manual were deliberately looked at until January 1–30, 2024. Methods: Two authors independently extricated all principal information utilizing standardized data extraction designs, and the analysis was done utilizing STATA version 17. Heterogeneity over the studies was evaluated utilizing I2 measurement. The funnel plot and Egger’s weighted regression tests were utilized to assess subjective and objective publication biases respectively. Also, the pooled effect of labor pain management and the associations were evaluated utilizing a random-effects model. Results: The general pooled prevalence of labor analgesia in the present study was 23.3% with a (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.5, 33.1). Maternal age (odds ratio (OR): 1.91; 95% CI: 1.11, 2.77), parity of the mother (OR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.06, 0.63), history of pregnancy misfortune (OR: 0.12; 95% CI: 0.11, 0.36), length of labor (OR: 2.09; 95% CI: 1.06, 3.13), and awareness about labor analgesia (OR: 1.91; 95% CI: 0.34, 3.49) were significantly related with labor analgesia among pregnant women in Ethiopia. Conclusions: The generally pooled prevalence of labor analgesia among pregnant women in Ethiopia was low. Maternal age, parity of the mother, history of pregnancy loss, length of labor, and awareness of labor analgesia were factors influencing labor analgesia among pregnant women in Ethiopia. This finding proposes exceptional consideration to make laboring mothers free of pain by scaling up the strategies and utilizing labor pain administration in a way that universally recognized standards are met. Registration number: PROSPERO CRD: 42024525636

References
  • 1.
    T. E. Geltore et al. (2024) Predictors of labor pain management among pregnant women in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Women's Health
Details
Listed seminar This seminar is open to all
Recorded Available to all
Q&A Now closed
Disclaimer The views expressed in this seminar are those of the speaker and not necessarily those of the journal