Investigating source use in L2 student writing: vocabulary, development and stakeholder perceptions (work-in-progress) - presented by Gergely Kajos

Investigating source use in L2 student writing: vocabulary, development and stakeholder perceptions (work-in-progress)

Gergely Kajos

GK
Slide at 19:38
UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS
What do we know about patchwriting?
Present in L1 and L2 students (Cumming et al., 2016, Pecorari,
2023)
Can be (and is usually) unintentional (Leu and Neumann, 2023)
A sign for more support (Pecorari, 2003)
Triggers include lack of academic reading skills (Jamieson and
Howard, 2013), unrealistic expectations in terms of source text
difficulty (Abasi and Akbari, 2006; Li and Casanave, 2012), inaccurate skills and knowledge to meet expectations (Pecorari,
2003; O'Neill, 2024), writing from one sentence (Howard et al., 2010)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
References
  • 1.
    A. Cumming et al. (2016) Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes
  • 2.
    D. Pecorari (2022) Plagiarism and English for academic purposes: A research agenda. Language Teaching
  • 3.
    9781003283485
  • 4.
    D. Pecorari (2003) Good and original: Plagiarism and patchwriting in academic second-language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing
  • 5.
    https://sandrajamieson.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/jamieson-sandra-rebecca-moore-howard-newdigitalscholar-ch5.pdf
  • 6.
    A. R. Abasi et al. (2006) Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school. Journal of Second Language Writing
  • 7.
    Y. Li and C. P. Casanave (2012) Two first-year students’ strategies for writing from sources: Patchwriting or plagiarism?. Journal of Second Language Writing
  • 8.
    G. O'Neill (2024) Tackling illegitimate intertextuality through socialization - An action research project. Journal of English for Academic Purposes
  • 9.
    R. M. Howard et al. (2010) Writing from Sources, Writing from Sentences. Writing & Pedagogy
Share slide
Summary (AI generated)

Research indicates that patch writing is not exclusively an issue for L2 students, although it is more prevalent among them. This phenomenon has been studied primarily in the context of non-native English speakers. Importantly, patch writing is often unintentional, complicating the definition of plagiarism.

There is a growing perspective within the academic literacy and practitioner community that views patch writing as a signal for the need for additional support, rather than equating it with deliberate academic dishonesty, such as purchasing an essay due to poor time management. Many students genuinely strive to succeed but struggle for various reasons.

Factors contributing to patch writing include limited reading comprehension skills, overly challenging course material, and a lack of awareness regarding academic literacy expectations. Notably, some students tend to write from a single source they deem appropriate, selecting specific sentences to paraphrase. Without adequate language proficiency or writing skills, this approach can easily result in patch writing. These challenges likely interact and serve as collective triggers rather than operating in isolation.