Active Manifold and Model Order Reduction to Accelerate Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization - presented by Prof. Charbel Farhat

Active Manifold and Model Order Reduction to Accelerate Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization

Prof. Charbel Farhat

Prof. Charbel Farhat
Slide at 11:19
Charbel
Surrogate Modeling
External representation
Internal representation
input
output
input
output
SYSTEM
SYSTEM
u=(111. Hp)
y =f((1) via the post-processing of a physics-
queried points
based, high-dimensional model (HDM) or low-
sampled points
dimensional model (LDM)
Examples and characterization
Examples and characterization
response surface models, artificial neural
simplified-physics models, projection-based
networks (ANNs), Gaussian processes (GPs)
reduced-order models (PROMs)
a few, pre-determined, scalar quantities of
Qols can be many, identified by exploration
interest (Qols) surrogate models of output(s) but not
Qols can be spatio-temporal fields
necessarily of underlying system
surrogate models of system and outputs
Share slide
Summary (AI generated)

Two examples will be focused on to provide a spectrum of possibilities. Starting with the disadvantages, these methods are not as popular due to the high entry bar. A deep understanding of physics and computational modeling is required, along with awareness of limitations. One cannot simply download software for model reductions or simplified physics and expect immediate results. However, research is about pushing boundaries and advancing technology for future improvements.

On the other hand, the advantages are significant. By building a surrogate model of the system rather than the output, one can explore numerous quantities of interest without prior knowledge. This allows for easy exploration of parameter domains, especially in parametric applications like NBO. Spatial-temporal fields, including vector fields, can be effectively analyzed using this approach.

To illustrate, consider the example of parachute designs for landing Perseverance on Mars. Despite extensive testing, both the disc sail parachute and the ring sail parachute failed at lower forces than expected. This discrepancy may be attributed to the fact that the parachutes were tested in a subsonic wind tunnel, highlighting the importance of understanding the limitations of testing environments.