Anthromes, CO2 and Terrestrial Carbon – Session 7: CO2-fertilization and human land-use contributions to future terrestrial carbon storage: What is the mitigation potential of improved land-use, and how will it respond to future climate change? - presented by Stephanie Roe | Agroforestry as a natural climate solution  - presented by Susan Cook-Patton | Global Carbon Dioxide Removal Potential of Trees in Agriculture - presented by Vivian Griffey | Effect of land use and land cover change and CO2 fertilization on the future carbon sink for the conterminous U.S - presented by Benjamin Felzer | What will happen to the terrestrial carbon sink once we reach net zero? - presented by Charlie Koven

Anthromes, CO2 and Terrestrial Carbon – Session 7: CO2-fertilization and human land-use contributions to future terrestrial carbon storage

Benjamin FelzerCharlie KovenStephanie RoeSusan Cook-PattonVivian Griffey
Slide at 02:19
Land sector provides readily available mitigation potenti
Cost-effective potential
Mitigation potential limited to a carbon
(<$100/tCO2) 2020 - - 2050 =
cost constraint of <$100/tCO2 ; more
8 - 14(11 avg) GtCO2eq yr
relevant for feasibility and policy making
24-42% of technical potential
The max biophysical potential or amount
is cost effective
possible with current technologies
Estimate
< USD20
< USD50
<USD100
Mitigation option
Technical
type
tCO2-eq-1
tCO2-eq-1
tCO2-eq-1
TOTAL AFOLU
(agriculture, forests & other ecosystems,
Sectoral
3.8 (2.7-4.9) -
4.3 (2.3 - 6.7)
13.6 (6.7 - 23.4)
28.4 (8.8 - 65.1)
diverted ag production from demand-side)
TOTAL AFOLU
(agriculture, forests & other ecosystems,
3.4 (0 - 14.6)
5.3 (0.6 - 19.4
7.9 (4.1 - 17.3)
BECCS)
Source: IPCC AR6 WGIII, Ch 7
1
References
  • 1.
    https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/
Share slide
Summary (AI generated)

I led the assessment of land-based mitigation potentials in the IPCC land chapter. Studies show that the land sector provides readily available mitigation potential today. Mitigation potentials calculate the scale of emission reductions and sequestration against a counterfactual scenario. For the IPCC, we assessed mitigation potentials from both sectoral studies and integrated assessment models.

We looked at technical potential, which is the maximum biophysical potential or amount possible with current technologies, as well as economic potential across various carbon prices. The cost-effective potential between 2020 and 2050 is 8 to 14 gigatons of CO2 equivalent. The lower range is the median value from the integrated assessment models, and the higher range is the median value from the sectoral studies. This 8 to 14 gigatons is 24 to 42% of the maximum technical potential available.

Cost-effective potential is the potential available up to $100 per ton of carbon, which is considered cost-effective because it's the median carbon price in 2030 and is lower than average in 2050 for a 1.5-degree pathway. These economic potentials are the most relevant for policymakers as it approximates feasibility.

The biggest source of variation in these estimates is in the types of potential, technical versus economic, as well as different approaches for estimation.